Exploring how understanding our brain’s perception of flavours and textures can help modify eating behaviours and reduce cravings for sweets and processed foods
Table of Contents
- What is Neurogastronomy and How Does It Influence Our Eating Experience?
- The Brain and Taste: How Does the Brain Process Flavors and Textures?
- The Role of Sight, Smell, Hearing, and Touch in Flavor Perception
- The Influence of Color, Shape, and Texture on Our Taste Preferences
- How Can We Alter Eating Habits Through Sensory Manipulation?
- Techniques to Reduce Cravings for Sweets and Processed Foods Using Neurogastronomy
- Clinical Applications of Neurogastronomy: Treating Obesity and Eating Disorders
- Neurogastronomy in the Food Industry: How Companies Use Sensory Science to Influence Consumers
- Ethical Challenges in Using Neurogastronomy to Change Eating Behaviors
- How to Apply Neurogastronomy Principles in Daily Life to Improve Health and Nutrition
- Bibliography
Have you ever wondered why certain foods taste better when you’re in a particular mood or setting? Or why do we often crave sweets and processed snacks even when we’re not hungry?
The emerging field of neurogastronomy delves into these questions, examining how our brain perceives flavours and textures. By understanding this intricate relationship, we can potentially ‘trick’ our senses to adopt healthier eating habits and diminish our attraction to less nutritious options.
In this article, we’ll journey through the fascinating world of neurogastronomy and discover how it can influence our daily dietary choices.
The presentation of food can alter our taste perception; for example, the color of a plate can make a dessert taste sweeter.
Fact 1 of 4
What is Neurogastronomy and How Does It Influence Our Eating Experience?
Imagine savoring a rich piece of dark chocolate. The immediate pleasure isn’t just about taste; it’s a symphony orchestrated by your brain, integrating multiple senses.
This intricate interplay is the essence of neurogastronomy—a field that delves into how our brains perceive flavors and textures, ultimately shaping our eating behaviors.
Neurogastronomy, a term coined by Dr. Gordon Shepherd in 2006, combines neuroscience, psychology, and gastronomy to explore how we experience food (Shepherd, 2012).
It’s not merely about taste buds detecting sweet, sour, salty, bitter, or umami flavors. Instead, it’s about how our brains synthesize these signals with inputs from other senses to create the rich tapestry of flavor we experience.
The Brain and Taste: How Does the Brain Process Flavors and Textures?
Our perception of taste begins when molecules from food interact with taste receptors on our tongue. These receptors send signals to the gustatory cortex in the brain, which identifies basic taste qualities. However, flavor perception is more complex, involving the integration of taste, smell, texture, and even visual cues.
The olfactory system (sense of smell) plays a pivotal role. When we chew, volatile compounds are released, traveling up to the olfactory receptors. This retronasal olfaction significantly contributes[1] to flavor perception, often more so than taste alone (Rozin, 1982). Additionally, the somatosensory system detects texture, temperature, and spiciness, further enriching our eating experience.
Interestingly, studies[2] have shown that our brains can be tricked. For instance, altering the sound of crunching can change the perceived freshness of food, highlighting the brain’s role in constructing our flavor experiences (Zampini & Spence, 2004).
The Role of Sight, Smell, Hearing, and Touch in Flavor Perception
Our eating experience is multisensory. Visual cues like color and plating influence expectations and taste perception. A study found that people perceived a strawberry mousse as 10% sweeter when served on a white plate compared to a black one, demonstrating the power of visual context (Piqueras-Fiszman et al., 2012).
Smell, as previously mentioned, is integral. Aromas can evoke memories and emotions, enhancing or detracting from the eating experience. The sound of food, such as the sizzle of a steak or the crunch of a crisp, also affects perception. Modifying[3] these sounds can alter how we perceive texture and freshness (Spence & Shankar, 2010).
Touch, through texture and temperature, provides critical information. Creaminess, crispiness, and warmth can influence satisfaction and satiety. For example, thicker liquids are often perceived as more filling, affecting[4] how much we consume (McCrickerd et al., 2012).
The Influence of Color, Shape, and Texture on Our Taste Preferences
Color significantly impacts our taste expectations and preferences. Brightly colored foods are often associated with ripeness and sweetness, while dull colors might suggest blandness. Research indicates that people perceive orange juice as sweeter and more flavorful when it’s a brighter orange, even if the taste is identical (Shankar et al., 2010).
Shape also plays a role. Round plates and utensils are linked[5] to sweetness, while angular shapes are associated with bitterness. This phenomenon, known as crossmodal correspondence, influences how we experience flavors (Velasco et al., 2016).
Texture affects not only mouthfeel but also flavor release and perception. Creamy textures can enhance sweetness, while rough textures might suppress it. Understanding these relationships allows chefs and food manufacturers to craft products that align with consumer preferences.
How Can We Alter Eating Habits Through Sensory Manipulation?
Given the brain’s role in flavor perception, we can leverage sensory manipulation to promote healthier eating habits. For instance, enhancing the visual appeal of vegetables by making them more colorful and attractive can increase[6] their consumption among children (Zeinstra et al., 2017).
Reducing sugar or salt in foods without compromising taste is possible by modifying texture or adding congruent aromas. A study demonstrated that adding vanilla aroma to a reduced-sugar yogurt made it taste sweeter, allowing for sugar reduction without affecting consumer satisfaction (Chambers et al., 2009).
Mindful eating practices, which involve paying full attention to the sensory aspects of food, can also shift preferences. By focusing on flavors, textures, and aromas, individuals may[7] develop a greater appreciation for whole foods over processed ones, aiding in healthier choices (Hong et al., 2011).
Our perception of flavor involves multiple senses, including taste, smell, sight, touch, and even sound.
Fact 2 of 4
Techniques to Reduce Cravings for Sweets and Processed Foods Using Neurogastronomy
Neurogastronomy, the study of how our brains perceive flavors, offers innovative strategies to curb cravings for sweets and processed foods. By understanding and manipulating sensory inputs, we can influence our dietary choices and promote healthier eating habits.
Sensory Manipulation to Alter Taste Perception
One effective technique involves modifying the sensory properties of food to influence taste perception. For instance, incorporating certain aromas can enhance sweetness perception without adding sugar.
A study[8] demonstrated that adding a vanilla aroma to a reduced-sugar yogurt increased its perceived sweetness, allowing for sugar reduction without compromising taste (Chambers et al., 2009).
Mindful Eating Practices
Mindful eating encourages individuals to fully engage their senses during meals, fostering a deeper appreciation for natural flavors and textures. This practice can reduce the desire for overly sweet or processed foods.
Research[9] indicates that mindfulness-based interventions can decrease cravings and promote healthier eating behaviors (Mason et al., 2016).
Altering Food Presentation
The visual presentation of food significantly impacts our taste expectations and satisfaction. By creatively presenting healthier options, we can make them more appealing.
For example, arranging fruits and vegetables in an attractive manner can increase[10] their desirability, potentially reducing cravings for less nutritious options (Zampollo et al., 2012).
Clinical Applications of Neurogastronomy: Treating Obesity and Eating Disorders
Neurogastronomy’s insights into flavor perception have profound implications for addressing obesity and eating disorders.
Rewiring Flavor Associations
Individuals with obesity or eating disorders often have altered flavor preferences, favoring high-sugar and high-fat foods. By retraining the brain to associate pleasure with healthier flavors, it’s possible to shift these preferences.
A study[11] found that repeated exposure to healthier foods can increase their acceptance and preference over time (Zeinstra et al., 9).
Olfactory Training
Olfactory training, which involves repeated exposure to specific scents, can enhance flavor perception and may aid in the treatment of eating disorders. This method has been shown[12] to improve olfactory function and could potentially modify food preferences (Damm et al., 2014).
Neurogastronomy in the Food Industry: How Companies Use Sensory Science to Influence Consumers
The food industry leverages neurogastronomy to design products that appeal to our sensory preferences, influencing purchasing decisions.
Factors like lighting, noise, and air quality in our surroundings can influence our taste perception and eating behavior.
Fact 3 of 4
Flavor Enhancement
Companies invest in research to create flavor profiles that maximize appeal. By understanding the neural mechanisms of taste and smell, they can develop[13] products that trigger positive sensory responses, encouraging repeat consumption (Small et al., 2013).
Packaging and Branding
Visual cues such as packaging color and design can influence taste perception and product appeal. For instance, products in red packaging are often perceived[14] as sweeter, affecting consumer choices (Spence et al., 2014).
Ethical Challenges in Using Neurogastronomy to Change Eating Behaviors
While neurogastronomy offers tools to influence eating behaviors, ethical considerations must be addressed.
Manipulation Concerns
Using sensory manipulation to alter food choices raises questions about consumer autonomy. There’s[15] a fine line between guiding healthier choices and manipulating preferences without informed consent (Barnhill et al., 2014).
Transparency and Consent
Ethical application requires transparency about how sensory science is used in food production and marketing. Consumers should be informed[16] about techniques that influence their choices, allowing for informed decision-making (Blumenthal-Barby, 2013).
How to Apply Neurogastronomy Principles in Daily Life to Improve Health and Nutrition
Individuals can harness neurogastronomy principles to make healthier food choices.
Enhancing Home Cooking
By experimenting with herbs, spices, and cooking methods, we can create flavorful, healthy meals that satisfy the palate without excessive sugar or fat. This approach can make[17] nutritious foods more enjoyable (Chen et al., 2013).
Mindful Eating Techniques
Practicing mindful eating by focusing on the sensory experience of food can reduce overeating and increase enjoyment of healthier options. This practice encourages a deeper connection to the eating experience, promoting[18] better dietary choices (Kristeller et al., 2014).
Our individual flavor preferences are shaped by a combination of biological, emotional, and cultural influences.
Fact 4 of 4
Bibliography
- [1] Rozin, P. (1982). "Taste-smell confusions" and the duality of the olfactory sense. Perception & Psychophysics, 31(4), 397-401. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202667
- [2] Zampini, M., & Spence, C. (2004). The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips. Journal of Sensory Studies, 19(5), 347-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2004.080403.x
- [3] Spence, C., & Shankar, M. U. (2010). The influence of auditory cues on the perception of, and responses to, food and drink. Journal of Sensory Studies, 25(3), 406-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00267.x
- [4] McCrickerd, K., Chambers, L., & Yeomans, M. R. (2012). Does modifying the thick texture and creamy flavor of a drink change portion size estimation and appetite? Appetite, 59(3), 655-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.012
- [5] Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., Deroy, O., & Spence, C. (2016). Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.005
- [6] Zeinstra, G. G., Koelen, M. A., Kok, F. J., & de Graaf, C. (2017). The influence of preparation practices on children’s liking of vegetables. Food Quality and Preference, 55, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.015
- [7] Hong, P. Y., Lishner, D. A., & Han, K. H. (2011). Mindfulness and eating: An experiment examining the effect of mindful raisin eating on the enjoyment of sampled food. Mindfulness, 2(4), 282-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0068-3
- [8] Chambers, L., Ells, H., & Yeomans, M. R. (2009). Can the satiating power of a high energy beverage be improved by manipulating sensory characteristics and label information? Food Quality and Preference, 20(7), 574-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.07.002
- [9] Mason, A. E., Epel, E. S., Aschbacher, K., Lustig, R. H., Acree, M., Kristeller, J., Cohn, M., Dallman, M., Moran, P. J., & Daubenmier, J. (2016). Reduced reward-driven eating accounts for the impact of a mindfulness-based diet and exercise intervention on weight loss: Data from the SHINE randomized controlled trial. Appetite, 100, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.009
- [10] Zampollo, F., Wansink, B., Kniffin, K. M., & Shimizu, M. (2012). Food plating preferences of children: The importance of presentation on desire for diversity. Acta Paediatrica, 101(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02409.x
- [11] Zeinstra, G. G., Koelen, M. A., Kok, F. J., & de Graaf, C. (2010). The influence of preparation practices on children’s liking of vegetables. Food Quality and Preference, 21(8), 906–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.06.001
- [12] Damm, M., Pikart, L. K., Reimann, H., Burkert, S., Göktas, O., Haxel, B., Frey, S., & Hüttenbrink, K. B. (2014). Olfactory training is helpful in postinfectious olfactory loss: A randomized, controlled, multicenter study. The Laryngoscope, 124(4), 826–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24340
- [13] Small, D. M., & Green, B. G. (2012). A proposed model of a flavor modality. In B. J. C. Moore (Ed.), The neural bases of multisensory processes (pp. 565–582). CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11092-38
- [14] Spence, C., & Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2014). The perfect meal: The multisensory science of food and dining. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118491003
- [15] Barnhill, A., King, K. F., Kass, N., & Faden, R. (2014). The value of unhealthy eating and the ethics of healthy eating policies. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 24(3), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2014.0020
- [16] Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. (2013). Choice architecture: A mechanism for improving decisions while preserving liberty. In C. Coons & M. Weber (Eds.), Paternalism: Theory and practice (pp. 178–196). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139179003.010
- [17] Chen, J., & Rosenthal, A. (2013). Modifying food texture: Novel approaches in development of healthy foods. Journal of Texture Studies, 44(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12007
- [18] Kristeller, J. L., & Wolever, R. Q. (2014). Mindfulness-based eating awareness training for treating binge eating disorder: The conceptual foundation. Eating Disorders, 22(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2013.864297