Intermittent Fasting

How Skipping Meals Became the Surprising Secret to More Energy and a Healthier Lifestyle

For many Dutch households, the idea of skipping a meal or two might sound like a radical change—after all, who can resist fresh bread and cheese at lunchtime? Yet, “intermittent fasting” has quickly turned into a buzzword that’s making its way through kitchens across the Netherlands.

It’s not about starving yourself; it’s about choosing strategic times to eat and giving your body a break in between. With promises of improved mood, sustained energy, and even a slimmer waistline, intermittent fasting is sparking curiosity far and wide. But is it just another fad, or could this new take on mealtime truly be the key to feeling fit and fabulous? Let’s dive in!

During fasting, the body uses stored fat instead of glucose, which can aid in weight management.

Fact 1 of 4

What Is Intermittent Fasting?

Intermittent Fasting (often abbreviated as IF) is an eating pattern that cycles between periods of eating and periods of fasting (deliberately refraining from consuming food or caloric beverages).

Unlike traditional diets that focus on reducing specific nutrients or total calorie intake, IF emphasizes when you eat rather than what you eat. For many Dutch individuals seeking a flexible and science-backed dietary strategy, IF has become an increasingly popular choice.

The idea is that by limiting the time window in which you consume food, you can potentially enhance metabolic health, support weight management, and even promote cellular repair processes (known as autophagy). However, IF is more than just skipping meals—it is grounded in a growing body of scientific literature[1] that suggests real physiological impacts (Trepanowski & Varady, 2015).

Historical Background

While the current popularity of IF might feel new, various forms of fasting have existed for centuries in different cultures and religions. From Ramadan in the Islamic faith to specific feast-and-fast traditions in Christianity and Judaism, structured eating windows are not a novel concept.

Modern intermittent fasting, though, applies this ancient practice to contemporary nutritional science, aiming to harness potential benefits for weight management and overall health.

Common Misconceptions

A frequent misconception among Dutch (and global) audiences is that IF means starvation. However, scientific studies clarify that intermittent fasting is distinct from chronic caloric restriction (long-term consumption of fewer calories than needed).

In IF, individuals still meet their daily or weekly nutrient needs but restrict intake to a specific time window, thus allowing the body to enter a fasting state regularly (Trepanowski & Varady, 2015). This distinction is crucial, as extended starvation can lead to nutrient deficiencies, while IF—when done correctly—should still supply adequate energy and nutrients over the long term.

Different Methods of Intermittent Fasting

Multiple methods of intermittent fasting have emerged, each catering to different lifestyles and goals. Below are some of the most common IF variations.

How Does It Work? Basic Principles of Low-Carb Diets

The 16:8 Method

In the 16:8 approach, individuals fast for 16 consecutive hours each day and limit all meals to an 8-hour window. For example, if someone finishes dinner by 8:00 PM, they would not eat again until noon the next day.

This method is popular in the Netherlands for its relative ease: many people simply skip breakfast or push it to lunchtime. Research indicates that a time-restricted eating schedule can help reduce late-night snacking, which is often associated with weight gain (Trepanowski & Varady, 2015).

The 5:2 Diet

The 5:2 diet involves eating normally for five days a week, then reducing caloric intake drastically (usually around 500–600 calories) on two non-consecutive days.

This method can be appealing for those who prefer a few days of significant calorie restriction rather than daily fasting. Some studies[2] have noted improvements in insulin sensitivity (the ability of cells to respond to insulin) and other metabolic markers after following this regimen (Johnson et al., 2007).

Alternate-Day Fasting

Alternate-Day Fasting (ADF) means fasting or significantly reducing calorie intake (by about 75–80%) every other day. On the “fast days,” calories are severely limited, while on the “feast days,” individuals may eat without restriction.

Though this method might sound challenging, early research suggests ADF can lead to weight loss and improved metabolic markers in certain populations, such as those with moderate asthma or obesity (Johnson et al., 2007). However, adherence can be difficult, so it’s essential to evaluate personal lifestyle factors before choosing this method.

Extended Fasting Periods

Some people practice extended fasts lasting 24 hours or longer, but these are generally less common and require careful monitoring.

According to Longo and Mattson (2014), extended fasting can stimulate autophagy (the body’s natural process of cleaning out damaged cells), but prolonged fasts should be approached cautiously to avoid nutrient deficiencies or other health risks.

IF may enhance how cells respond to insulin, potentially lowering Type 2 diabetes risk.

Fact 2 of 4

The Health Benefits of Intermittent Fasting

Intermittent fasting is often promoted for more than just weight management. A growing body of evidence indicates that IF might offer multiple health advantages beyond shedding extra kilos.

Metabolic Health and Insulin Sensitivity

One of the most discussed benefits of IF is improved insulin sensitivity. Insulin sensitivity refers to how effectively your body’s cells respond to insulin (a hormone responsible for regulating blood sugar levels).

Reduced insulin sensitivity, or insulin resistance, is often a precursor to Type 2 diabetes. Studies have shown that time-restricted feeding patterns can lead to lower blood glucose levels and enhanced insulin function in both healthy individuals and those with metabolic syndrome (Trepanowski & Varady, 2015).

Weight Management and Appetite Regulation

For many Dutch adults aiming to maintain or lose weight, IF can be a strategic choice. By confining eating to specific time windows, individuals often experience a natural reduction in daily calorie intake, particularly if they avoid processed snacks outside of their eating window.

In a clinical trial observing the 5:2 diet, participants reduced calorie consumption without consciously counting every calorie (Johnson et al., 2007). Moreover, some people report improved appetite control, thanks to stable blood sugar and hormone regulation over fasting periods.

Cellular Repair and Inflammation

Scientists have long studied the potential anti-inflammatory effects of fasting. Inflammation (the immune system’s response to injury or infection) can become problematic when chronic, raising the risk of various diseases.

Research[3] indicates that fasting may reduce pro-inflammatory markers and oxidative stress, partly due to its effects on autophagy (Longo & Mattson, 2014). By periodically giving the body a break from digestion, the theory is that resources shift toward cellular “clean-up” and repair activities.

Impact on Cardiovascular Health

While more large-scale studies are needed, some preliminary data suggest[4] that IF could help improve cholesterol profiles and lower blood pressure (Harvie & Howell, 2017).

A healthy cardiovascular system is especially crucial for countries like the Netherlands, where a significant portion of the population remains active through biking and other physical activities. Keeping blood vessels and the heart healthy supports overall well-being and performance in daily tasks and exercise.

Does It Really Work? The Scientific Studies

In weighing whether intermittent fasting truly delivers on its promises, the scientific literature provides both cautious optimism and the need for further investigation.

Human Trials and Observational Studies

One frequently cited study analyzed the impact of alternate-day calorie restriction on overweight individuals with moderate asthma, finding not only weight loss but also reduced oxidative stress and inflammation (Johnson et al., 2007).

Another review paper on intermittent fasting and human metabolic health concluded that IF can have positive effects on body composition and may reduce the risks associated with metabolic syndrome (Trepanowski & Varady, 2015). These findings align with other research highlighting improved insulin sensitivity and potential protective effects against certain chronic diseases.

Limitations and Ongoing Research

Despite these encouraging findings, limitations exist. Some studies involve small sample sizes or short durations, making it challenging to determine long-term sustainability and possible side effects. Additionally, individual variability is significant.

Genetic factors, lifestyle differences, and personal preferences all influence how well someone might adapt to an IF regimen (Harvie & Howell, 2017). More rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed to establish standardized guidelines, especially for populations with pre-existing health conditions.

Considerations for the Dutch Context

In the Netherlands, traditional eating patterns often involve three main meals—ontbijt (breakfast), lunch, and avondeten (dinner)—plus some snacks like coffee with a koekje. Adopting intermittent fasting could mean shifting or skipping these traditional meal times.

For instance, in the 16:8 method, a person might push ontbijt to later in the day, aligning better with lunch. While this adjustment may seem culturally significant, many find that a flexible approach—such as an 8-hour eating window—fits into a busy schedule of work, biking, and social life.

Practical Tips and Medical Advice

Before embarking on an IF plan, especially if you have a chronic condition (such as diabetes or heart disease), it is crucial to consult a healthcare professional.

Monitoring key health indicators like blood sugar, blood pressure, and nutrient levels can help ensure a safe transition to any fasting regimen (Longo & Mattson, 2014). Additionally, focusing on nutrient-dense foods during eating windows helps maintain balanced nutrition.

Emphasize proteins, healthy fats, whole grains, and plenty of fruits and vegetables to ensure you meet your micronutrient requirements.

The Challenges and Disadvantages of Intermittent Fasting

Intermittent Fasting (IF) has gained considerable attention in recent years, especially among Dutch individuals seeking new approaches to nutrition and health.

However, before jumping on the bandwagon, it is crucial to understand the potential pitfalls and complications that may arise from following such a regimen. While IF can be beneficial, several challenges and disadvantages must be addressed to ensure that those interested can make informed decisions.

Hunger and Mood Swings

One of the most immediate challenges people encounter when they begin IF is increased hunger during fasting windows. For some, this translates to irritability or mood swings, which can affect work performance and social interactions.

According to [5], G. M., & La Bounty, P. M. (2015). Effects of intermittent fasting on body composition and clinical health markers in humans. Nutrition Reviews, 73(10), 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuv041″ class=”js–wpm-format-cite”>Tinsley[5] and La Bounty (2015), spikes in the stress hormone cortisol can also occur when individuals are in a fasted state, potentially leading to heightened feelings of anxiety or restlessness. These issues may gradually subside as the body adapts to the fasting schedule, but it is worth noting that not everyone adjusts at the same rate.

Potential Nutrient Deficiencies

Because IF often restricts the eating window, there is a risk that individuals may consume fewer overall nutrients if they do not plan meals properly.

Rushing to eat large meals in a short timeframe might lead to imbalanced diets that are low in essential vitamins and minerals (micronutrients). Inadequate intake of calcium, iron, or certain B vitamins may pose risks to long-term health.

Varady (2016) points[6] out that monitoring nutrient density (the ratio of nutrients to calories in foods) is critical, particularly for individuals who have higher nutritional needs such as pregnant women, older adults, or athletes.

Social and Cultural Barriers

In the Netherlands, many social events revolve around shared meals or coffee breaks with pastries (such as a koekje). Restricting eating to specific hours can make it difficult to participate in these communal moments without feeling left out or having to explain dietary choices repeatedly.

Antoni et al. (2017) note[7] that the cultural aspects of mealtimes play a significant role in the success of any nutritional program. When family members or friends have different eating habits, individuals practicing IF may experience social isolation or feel pressured to deviate from their fasting schedule.

Long-Term Sustainability and Compliance

While some people thrive on the discipline IF provides, others find it unsustainable over long periods. The psychological burden of constantly monitoring the clock and adhering to a strict schedule can be challenging.

Patterson and Sears (2017) argue[8] that compliance rates for IF may vary widely depending on personal lifestyles, work schedules, and family commitments. Over time, the initial enthusiasm might wane, leading to inconsistent adherence or complete abandonment of fasting protocols.

Risks for Certain Populations

Not everyone should attempt IF without proper guidance. Individuals with a history of disordered eating, for instance, may find the fasting periods triggering, potentially exacerbating unhealthy eating behaviors.

Harvie and Howell (2017) emphasize[9] that those with pre-existing medical conditions—such as Type 1 diabetes, low blood pressure, or chronic kidney disease—should consult healthcare providers before making any significant dietary changes.

Furthermore, pregnant or breastfeeding women require adequate nutrition around the clock, making standard IF protocols less appropriate unless adapted by a qualified professional.

Fasting can trigger autophagy, the body’s process of removing damaged cells.

Fact 3 of 4

Impact on Physical Performance

Although some athletes and fitness enthusiasts in the Netherlands successfully implement IF, there can be disadvantages for individuals who engage in high-intensity workouts.

Without careful meal planning, training in a fasted state may lead[10] to reduced performance or slower recovery times (Regmi & Heilbronn, 2020). Glycogen stores (the body’s reservoir of carbohydrates) may be depleted, impacting stamina and strength.

While some research supports fasted workouts for fat adaptation, the potential drawbacks, including fatigue or dizziness, must be weighed carefully.

How to Start Intermittent Fasting in a Smart Way?

Given the potential drawbacks, starting IF “the Dutch way” involves a thoughtful, deliberate approach that minimizes risks and maximizes benefits. By prioritizing gradual changes, careful meal planning, and regular check-ins with health professionals, one can navigate common pitfalls more effectively.

Seek Medical Advice and Perform Baseline Checks

Before incorporating IF into daily life, especially if you have underlying health conditions, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.

Tinsley and La Bounty (2015) highlight the importance of checking baseline metabolic markers (such as blood glucose levels, cholesterol, and blood pressure) to ensure that fasting does not exacerbate any pre-existing conditions.

If you are on medication for hypertension, diabetes, or other chronic illnesses, your dosage and timing may need adjustments when fasting windows change.

Choose an Appropriate Fasting Protocol

Starting with a gentler approach can help you adapt more smoothly. For example, the 12:12 method—fasting for 12 hours and eating within a 12-hour window—allows the body to ease into the practice without extreme hunger.

Varady (2016) suggests that beginners might find more restrictive plans (like 16:8 or 5:2) too challenging initially. By gradually increasing fasting hours, you reduce the likelihood of negative side effects such as severe hunger pangs or irritability.

Focus on Nutrient-Dense Foods

A smart IF approach requires paying close attention to what you eat during your non-fasting windows. Nutrient density (the concentration of vitamins, minerals, and other essential nutrients relative to caloric content) becomes especially important.

Prioritize whole grains, lean proteins, healthy fats (such as avocados and nuts), and plenty of fruits and vegetables to ensure you are obtaining a balanced intake of micronutrients. Antoni et al. (2017) mention that optimizing nutrient quality is one of the best ways to mitigate risks associated with restrictive eating windows.

Stay Hydrated and Monitor Energy Levels

Fasting can sometimes lead to mild dehydration, particularly if individuals are accustomed to consuming fluids with their meals. Drinking water or calorie-free beverages (like tea or black coffee) helps maintain hydration and may curb hunger.

Keeping a simple log of energy levels, mood, and exercise performance can be beneficial for detecting patterns or early signs of nutrient deficiency (Patterson & Sears, 2017). Adjusting fluid intake and meal composition based on these observations can significantly improve the overall IF experience.

Be Mindful of Social Commitments

Rather than avoiding social situations, plan ahead. For instance, if you have a family gathering or a work meeting with snacks, you might adjust your fasting window slightly to accommodate these events. This flexibility helps maintain a balance between health goals and cultural or social norms in the Netherlands, such as sharing a meal with colleagues or celebrating a birthday with traditional Dutch treats like appeltaart (apple pie). Harvie and Howell (2017) stress that long-term adherence often depends on how well an eating plan fits into an individual’s social and cultural context.

Is Intermittent Fasting the Next Trend or Just Another Fad?

With the growing popularity of IF in the Netherlands and beyond, it is natural to wonder if this eating pattern will stand the test of time.

Some evidence supports its efficacy in areas such as weight management, metabolic health, and reduced inflammation, yet numerous challenges and disadvantages must be acknowledged.

Compliance remains a significant hurdle, particularly over the long term. Additionally, the heightened risk of nutrient deficiencies or exacerbation of certain medical conditions signals a clear need for caution.

Ultimately, whether IF is a fleeting trend or a sustainable strategy depends largely on the individual. People who thrive on structure and can adapt their social lives around fasting windows may find IF beneficial.

Others, however, might struggle with hunger, social isolation, and potential health risks. Regmi and Heilbronn (2020) emphasize that comprehensive research, along with careful personalization and professional guidance, is the key to any long-term dietary success.

For those willing to invest the time and effort to tailor an IF plan to their unique physiological and lifestyle needs, intermittent fasting can be more than just a passing fad—it can be a practical and potentially impactful approach to health and nutrition.

Sticking to natural day-night rhythms may boost the positive effects of fasting.

Fact 4 of 4

Bibliography